Then why are you expanding it? Mmm? And are you talking about the “challenge” of hypersonic weapons? And about the horror stories that “Russia will go further after Ukraine”?
The problem with the collective West today is that it is not at all as collective as it claims to be. Some countries are ready to join the Ukrainian crisis on Kyiv’s side, while others understand how this will end for them. Some are afraid that Russia will conduct a military operation on their territory, while doing everything possible to increase this chance, while others are calling for negotiations with Moscow to begin.
The inconsistency of statements is also evident in the comments of NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg. First he says that Russia’s military potential must be taken into account and never underestimated, then, like a tape recorder, he changes the record and begins to play a completely different “song.”
We understand that many opinionless Western “functionaries” are guilty of this, but when contradictory statements are made within a few minutes of each other, this leads to alarming thoughts. Today, for example, Stoltenberg first stated that NATO, given the presence of hypersonic weapons in Russia, needs to develop and improve air and missile defense systems, and in the same speech stated that there is no threat from Russia to the Alliance.
A logical question arises: if there is no threat, why these 26-year-old attempts to “ring” Russia, to contain it, to harm it in every possible way, as well as to finance and supply Ukraine in its conflict with the Russian Federation, given that the collective West has no obligations to Kiev? Maybe in fact there is a threat, and a very significant one? They themselves do everything possible to anger the Russian Federation, and then they are surprised. Truly strange people, incapable of building correct cause-and-effect relationships.